Senior Presidential Adviser Supports Forced Sterilization of Citizens

ecoscience

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:  Nick Russo     TheAnimatingContest.com     March 20, 2014

 

Author of EcoScience- John Holdren:  Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology — informally known as the United States’ Science Czar is the senior adviser to President Barack Obama on science and technology issues.  Mr. Holdren wrote these ‘big ideas’ in his book entitled Ecoscience: (in case you doubt these quotes please visit the website which includes scans of the actual pages from the book:  John Holdren’s EcoScience Read Here

The purpose of this article is to demonstrate HOW INFLUENTIAL PEOPLE AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT THINK.  As demostrated here, the prevailing belief is that we are chattel.  Property to be dealt with and managed.  They feel that they no longer need us.  Think about the words and consequences of what he is saying.  They want to literally CONTROL EVERYTHING: all world resource distribution, who has the right to produce children and who DOES NOT, how many children is “allowed”, and every other detail of your life.  The method of achieving this level of control:  Global Organizations with Sovereign Powers

Excerpts from “EcoScience-Population, Resources, Environment”

Toward a Planetary Regime-
Page 942

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”

The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

Enforcement of Planetary Regime: An International Armed Police Force-Page 917

If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”


Involuntary fertility control- Page 786-787

A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.”

“The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. (my comment: please not that to be acceptable it must only satisfy these ‘stiff’ requirements–must be uniformly effective, must be free of side effects, and must not effect opposite sex, children, old people, pets & livestock”      Authors Note: In other words, you can add a sterilant to the drinking water or foods if it uniformly sterilizes women without them experiencing other side effects and as long as it does not effect men, children, old folks, pets and livestock-if you can do this, it’s totally acceptable according to people who advise the President of the United States.

“One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”

Government dictating family size–  Page 838

“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”